CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor California State Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the CDPH Lead Inspector/Assessor Exam. Gain confidence with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with explanations. Ace your California exam!

Practice this question and more.


Do temporary abatement control methods require certification for individuals performing the work?

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. Only if the job is large

  4. Only for hazardous materials

The correct answer is: No

Temporary abatement control methods, such as sealing, encapsulation, or using protective barriers, generally do not require certification for individuals performing the work. These methods are typically less invasive and may not involve the disturbing of lead-based paint or the removal of lead hazards, which necessitates more stringent regulations and certified professionals. This understanding is rooted in the idea that temporary control measures are often considered maintenance actions rather than full abatement. While they must still comply with health and safety standards, they do not come with the same level of regulatory oversight that permanent abatement does, which is designed to ensure that lead is permanently removed and that workers are properly trained and certified to handle hazardous materials. In contrast, permanent abatement methods, which involve significant disruption and potentially more exposure to hazardous materials, do require certification to ensure that the workers are adequately trained in safe practices and the regulations that govern lead-based hazards.